the appellant (defendant) Changzhou Wujin Dongfang bearing manufacturing limited company, domiciled in village of Jiangsu city of Changzhou province Wujin high tech Industrial Development Zone, gong.

legal representative Yu Liqun, chairman of the company.

agent: Chu Chengxing, lawyer of Jiangsu Changzhou.

by the appellant (plaintiff) Changzhou Guangyang bearing limited company, domiciled in Jiangsu Province, Changzhou City New District Hanjiang Road No. 52.

legal representative Cheng Shangnan, chairman of the company.

agent Shen Keping, lawyer of Changzhou East China law firm, Jiangsu.

of the defendant Shanghai rushed network technology limited company, domiciled in Shanghai city Nanhui District hangtou town Shanghai Road No. 5842 Building 5 room 134.

legal representative Liu Zhiyong, chairman of the company.

of the defendant Beijing Xinnet digital information technology limited company, domiciled in Beijing city of Haidian District Zhongguancun South Street No. 5, ligongkeji building room 1206.

legal representative Chen   Dan, general manager of the company.

agent Li Yubo.

Changzhou Wujin Dongfang Bearing Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Orient Corp) and Changzhou Guangyang Bearing Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Guangyang company), Shanghai rushed Network Information Technology Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the new company, Beijing rushed) network digital information technology Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the new company) copyright infringement dispute case. With Jiangsu Province, Changzhou City Intermediate People’s Court (2006) the three word of the beginning of 0046, the civil judgment, and appealed to the present court. After accepting the court on July 5, 2007, the court formed a collegial panel in accordance with the law, and on September 21, 2007, held a public hearing on the case. Orient Corp agent Chu Chengxing, Guangyang company attorney Shen Kecheng, Beijing company attorney Li Yubo to take part in the proceedings, the company immediately after the subpoena, the court refused to unwarranted. The case is now the end of the trial.

Guangyang company first instance alleged: Guangyang company of the famous bearing manufacturing enterprises, long supply of national and international famous automobile manufacturers bearing production, reputation. In May 1997 the company registered the domain name, set up their own website. Strict management, excellent product quality, appropriate sales strategy, and seek truth from facts, so that its sales increased year by year. Recently, Guangyang company Orient Corp found on its website (called, plagiarism Guangyang company website format and content, some almost stole all the pages, including the page layout, text, pictures and other publicity. The behavior of the Orient Corp so that many customers mistakenly believe that the size of the company, product quality and reputation, so that the same Guangyang company, Guangyang company lost a lot of business opportunities, bearing sales fell about 730 thousand, profit fell 55>